“Only the ‘good-hearted’ falls for Hamas’s [Palestinian] narrative” what a western media official had to say on current events. Deceit does not involve a lie necessarily. Rather a deformation of the truth, for the real devil in this case was in the tonality: one of sarcasm and pity.

But who else but the good-hearted would hear and feel for the tormented? As for the tonality, it does raise questions. What is it that ties ‘good-hearted’ with ‘naïveté’? And to whom? Amongst other questions.

In an attempt to ‘move the masses’ the egalitarian parasite would say: “What is the use of people without land?” But only the conqueror would challenge that and say: “Exactly.” The consensus is not surprising: the egalitarian and the elitist are merely each other’s double.

The fever is not in ownership of land (property), rather caused by it: the withering away of the line separating spend from pay; a fate similar to that between good-hearted and naïveté. You pay for others to spend, you spend for others today, was the formula early into capitalism.

As the industry overdetermine itself so will the spend-pay dialectics. At the stage of maturity (imperialism) the residuals too mature from the visible to the invisible: some only spend, some only pay.

Regarding the enclave “both parties must compromise for a ceasefire” a parasite would say: perverted equality. “Those who only pay will only keep paying” they will never say: greed!

“What is the use of people without land?” Repeats the egalitarian parasite. But if that is the case what would make the slumdogs of the refugee camp die for it? That who is of no use is more likely to be suicidal is one way to put it. A refugee is a de-facto victim of murder, is another. A separate question is “What makes others so threatened by the utopia of the dead, that is the camps, to have to turn them into the largest open-air prison known?

One can say then that the refugee, this person that paradoxically needs to be murdered to commit suicide, the fusion of life and death, the everything and the nothing, is just an anarchist. Who else is a prison for? One of many institutions on first line of defense against the suicide of the tormented, or ‘the useless.’

“Those who need to feel a sense of belonging to call it their land” are not the double of “those who need a land to find a sense of belonging.” “Those who lose sense of belonging to gain a land” are.